compare
Compare two parties
Pick any two parties for a compared brief — top divergences and convergences auto-computed from the dataset, a comparative political-science brief for canonical pairs, plus the compass overlay, spider overlay, and axis-by-axis table.
Average axis distance
3.97
Lower = more similar (Euclidean across shared axes, normalized by count)
Same country · IQ. Same family (islamist-shia). Both currently in government. Founded 8 years apart. Mean axis distance Δ̄ 3.97.
Where they split hardest
- Centralism vs federalism
State of Law Coalition -7.5 · centralist vs National Wisdom Movement +1.0 · federalist
Δ 8.5 points
- Civil liberties
State of Law Coalition -6.5 · Restrict vs National Wisdom Movement -1.0 · Restrict
Δ 5.5 points
- Liberal democracy
State of Law Coalition -6.0 · Weak/anti vs National Wisdom Movement -1.0 · Weak/anti
Δ 5.0 points
Where they almost overlap
- Palestinian question
+7.0 vs +7.0
Δ 0.0 points
- State & religion
-6.0 vs -5.0
Δ 1.0 points
- Pan-Arab vs particularist
-4.0 vs -3.0
Δ 1.0 points
State of Law Coalition vs. National Wisdom Movement
Iraq's Shia rift. The Maliki-rooted State of Law's pro-Iran muqawama coalition against Hikma's Sistani-aligned Iraqi-nationalist clerical-electoral project.
Origins. The State of Law Coalition (I'tilaf Dawlat al-Qanoun) was founded by Nouri al-Maliki in 2009 as a vehicle for his second-term Dawa-party-led government; Dawa itself dates to 1957. The National Wisdom Movement (Tayyar al-Hikma al-Watani) was founded in 2017 by Ammar al-Hakim, who broke from the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (founded 1982 in Tehran as SCIRI) to form a more nationally-oriented Iraqi Shia movement.
Where they diverge. Both are Shia, both endorse a parliamentary system under the post-2003 constitution, but the regional alignment axis cleaves them sharply. State of Law sits inside the Coordination Framework, the pro-Iran muqawama coalition that includes the IRGC-aligned Asa'ib Ahl al-Haq and Kata'ib Hezbollah blocs. Hikma is aligned with the Najaf-centered, Sistani-aligned clerical establishment that has consistently pushed against Iranian dominance and toward a "Iraq-first" Shia identity. On militia integration: State of Law has been the principal political backer of the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF) as a permanent state institution; Hikma has pushed for state monopoly on arms. On Sunni reconciliation: Hikma's rhetoric is more inclusive; State of Law's legacy includes the 2013 raid on Hawija and the rise of ISIS-friendly grievances.
Where they overlap. Both endorse a unified Iraqi state against KRG independence claims. Both broadly accept the post-2003 muhasasa (confessional power-sharing) system, even when criticising it.
Why it matters today. With the 2024 Sadrist withdrawal from electoral politics, State of Law is the de facto leading Shia bloc. Hikma's smaller seat count gives it brokerage influence in coalition formation.
Primary documents
Most recent docs in the Tayyar corpus from each party. Click through for full text.
A State of Law Coalition
- البرنامج الانتخابي لائتلاف دولة القانون — الثوابت السياسية والمرتكزات الوطنية 2025-10-01
- State of Law-led (Maliki) government's press-freedom record: the Communications and Media Commission's 28 Apr 2013 suspension of 10 satellite channels (incl. Al Jazeera), targeting opposition/pro-Sunni outlets after their Hawija-raid coverage — HRW found no legal basis (arbitrary). Documented by Human Rights Watch (30 Apr 2013); corroborated by CPJ. 2013-04-28
B National Wisdom Movement
Compass
A · State of Law Coalition and B · National Wisdom Movement are pinned with always-on labels. Other parties stay visible as faded context so you can locate either side on the map at a glance.
Spider overlay
A is the solid teal polygon; B is the dashed amber overlay. Distinct colors so the eye can always tell them apart, regardless of family.
Axis-by-axis
Sorted by absolute difference. Δ is A − B.
- Centralism vs federalism A-7.5B+1.0Δ -8.5
- Civil liberties A-6.5B-1.0Δ -5.5
- Liberal democracy A-6.0B-1.0Δ -5.0
- Traditionalism vs modernization A-3.0B+2.0Δ -5.0
- Economic A-3.5B+1.0Δ -4.5
- Iran posture A+7.0B+3.0Δ +4.0
- West alignment A-5.0B-2.0Δ -3.0
- Regional stance A-5.0B-2.0Δ -3.0
- Social A-6.0B-4.0Δ -2.0
- Regime stance A+8.0B+6.0Δ +2.0
- Sectarian power-sharing A-7.0B-5.0Δ -2.0
- State & religion A-6.0B-5.0Δ -1.0
- Pan-Arab vs particularist A-4.0B-3.0Δ -1.0
- Palestinian question A+7.0B+7.0Δ +0.0