All axes · compass

Economic

الاقتصاد

Degree to which the actor favors market mechanisms (positive) vs. state allocation (negative).

Scoring rubric

How positions are calibrated on this axis. The conventions guide the scorer; anchored examples show how known MENA actors land at -10, -5, 0, +5, +10.

Score the actor on its stated economic platform and observed policy positions. The axis runs from full state allocation (-10: central planning, broad nationalization, comprehensive welfare state) to laissez-faire markets (+10: minimal state, deregulation, privatized social services). When platforms are partially religiously framed, score on the economic outcome advocated rather than the framing; note the religious framing in the entity description.

  • -10
    Full state ownership of means of production
    Historical Yemeni Socialist Party in the PDRY
  • -7
    Strong nationalization, broad welfare state
    Sudanese Communist Party
  • -3
    Mixed economy with strong public sector
    Hadash, USFP Morocco
  • +0
    Pragmatic welfare-state social democracy
    Egyptian Social Democratic Party
  • +3
    Market-oriented with some safety net
    Yesh Atid
  • +7
    Strongly pro-market, minimal regulation
    Free Egyptians Party
  • +10
    Libertarian, minimal-state
    No clear MENA exemplar; theoretical extreme
Parties scored
83
Mean
-0.67
Median
-0.50
Std dev
4.54
Range
-9.0 → 8.0

Ranking

All parties scored on this axis, sorted from most Market to most Statist.

Statist ← → Market

-10-5+0+5+10
  1. 1 Free Egyptians Party EG
    +8.0
  2. 2 National Rally of Independents MA
    +8.0
  3. 3 Yisrael Beiteinu IL
    +6.0
  4. 4 Likud IL
    +6.0
  5. 5 Long Live Tunisia TN
    +6.0
  6. 6 National Forces Alliance LY
    +6.0
  7. 7 New Hope IL
    +5.5
  8. 8 New Wafd Party EG
    +5.0
  9. 9 Syrian National Coalition SY
    +5.0
  10. 10 Authenticity and Modernity Party MA
    +5.0
  11. 11 Kataeb Party LB
    +5.0
  12. 12 Lebanese Forces LB
    +5.0
  13. 13 Kurdistan Democratic Party IQ
    +4.0
  14. 14 Yesh Atid IL
    +4.0
  15. 15 Religious Zionism Party IL
    +3.5
  16. 16 Southern Transitional Council YE
    +3.5
  17. 17 National Charter Party JO
    +3.5
  18. 18 National Unity IL
    +3.0
  19. 19 Justice and Development Party MA
    +3.0
  20. 20 Al-Menbar Islamic Society BH
    +3.0
  21. 21 Islamic Asalah Society BH
    +3.0
  22. 22 Mostaqbal Watan EG
    +3.0
  23. 23 El Insaf (Equity Party) MR
    +2.8
  24. 24 Yemeni Congregation for Reform (Islah) YE
    +2.5
  25. 25 Democratic Unionist Party SD
    +2.5
  26. 26 Hayat Tahrir al-Sham SY
    +2.5
  27. 27 Reform Party JO
    +2.5
  28. 28 Nour Party EG
    +2.5
  29. 29 Ennahda TN
    +2.0
  30. 30 Free Patriotic Movement LB
    +2.0
  31. 31 Istiqlal Party MA
    +2.0
  32. 32 National Umma Party SD
    +2.0
  33. 33 Otzma Yehudit IL
    +2.0
  34. 34 Freedom and Justice Party EG
    +2.0
  35. 35 Patriotic Union of Kurdistan IQ
    +2.0
  36. 36 Fatah PS
    +1.5
  37. 37 Noam IL
    +1.0
  38. 38 National Wisdom Movement IQ
    +1.0
  39. 39 Free Destourian Party TN
    +1.0
  40. 40 Movement of Society for Peace DZ
    +0.0
  41. 41 Justice and Construction Party LY
    +0.0
  42. 42 Mubadara PS
    -0.5
  43. 43 National Rally for Reform and Development (Tewassoul) MR
    -1.0
  44. 44 Islamic Action Front JO
    -1.0
  45. 45 The Democrats IL
    -2.0
  46. 46 Al-Wefaq National Islamic Society BH
    -2.0
  47. 47 Sairoon Alliance IQ
    -2.0
  48. 48 Democratic National Rally DZ
    -2.0
  49. 49 General People's Congress YE
    -2.0
  50. 50 Ra'am (United Arab List) IL
    -2.0
  51. 51 Egyptian Social Democratic Party EG
    -2.5
  52. 52 Ta'al IL
    -3.0
  53. 53 Meretz IL
    -3.0
  54. 54 Islamic Salvation Front DZ
    -3.0
  55. 55 Israeli Labor Party IL
    -3.0
  56. 56 Hamas PS
    -3.0
  57. 57 Northern Islamic Movement IL
    -3.0
  58. 58 Amal Movement LB
    -3.5
  59. 59 State of Law Coalition IQ
    -3.5
  60. 60 Socialist Forces Front DZ
    -4.0
  61. 61 Socialist Union of Popular Forces MA
    -4.0
  62. 62 Balad IL
    -4.0
  63. 63 Palestinian Islamic Jihad PS
    -4.0
  64. 64 Progressive Socialist Party LB
    -4.0
  65. 65 Shas IL
    -5.0
  66. 66 National Liberation Front DZ
    -5.0
  67. 67 Hezbollah LB
    -5.0
  68. 68 United Torah Judaism IL
    -5.0
  69. 69 Union of Forces of Progress MR
    -5.5
  70. 70 Yemeni Socialist Party YE
    -6.0
  71. 71 People's Movement TN
    -6.0
  72. 72 Ansar Allah (Houthis) YE
    -6.0
  73. 73 Hadash-Ta'al IL
    -6.0
  74. 74 Ba'ath Party (Syria) SY
    -6.5
  75. 75 Tagammu Party EG
    -7.0
  76. 76 Sudanese Communist Party SD
    -8.0
  77. 77 Hadash IL
    -8.0
  78. 78 DFLP PS
    -8.0
  79. 79 Palestinian People's Party PS
    -8.0
  80. 80 Tunisian Workers Party TN
    -9.0
  81. 81 Workers' Party DZ
    -9.0
  82. 82 Jordanian Communist Party JO
    -9.0
  83. 83 PFLP PS
    -9.0

Score distribution

Histogram of scores across all 83 parties. Mean -0.67, median -0.50, σ 4.54. Multi-modal distributions point to genuine cleavages on this axis; unimodal narrow ones to consensus.

-9: 4 parties -8: 4 parties -7: 1 party -6: 5 parties -5: 5 parties -4: 5 parties -3: 8 parties 8 -2: 7 parties 7 -1: 2 parties +0: 3 parties +1: 3 parties +2: 8 parties 8 +3: 11 parties 11 +4: 5 parties +5: 5 parties +6: 5 parties +8: 2 parties −10 0 +10

Statist Market

By country

Mean score per country.

  • Libya 2 parties
    +3.00
  • Morocco 5 parties
    +2.80
  • Egypt 7 parties
    +1.57
  • Bahrain 3 parties
    +1.33
  • Syria 3 parties
    +0.33
  • Iraq 5 parties
    +0.30
  • Lebanon 6 parties
    -0.08
  • Israel 19 parties
    -0.68
  • Jordan 4 parties
    -1.00
  • Sudan 3 parties
    -1.17
  • Tunisia 5 parties
    -1.20
  • Mauritania 3 parties
    -1.25
  • Yemen 5 parties
    -1.60
  • Algeria 6 parties
    -3.83
  • Palestine 7 parties
    -4.43

Cross-axis correlations

How parties' scores on this axis covary with their scores on each other axis. Pearson r runs from −1 (perfect inverse) to +1 (perfect identity); 0 means independent. Computed across all parties scored on both axes (n shown per row). Strong correlations expose which axes are really measuring the same cleavage in the data; near-zero values are the ones with the most additional explanatory power.