compare
Compare two parties
Pick any two parties for a compared brief — top divergences and convergences auto-computed from the dataset, a comparative political-science brief for canonical pairs, plus the compass overlay, spider overlay, and axis-by-axis table.
Average axis distance
4.83
Lower = more similar (Euclidean across shared axes, normalized by count)
Same country · LB. Same family (religious-christian). Founded 69 years apart. Mean axis distance Δ̄ 4.83.
Where they split hardest
- Regional stance
Kataeb Party +6.0 · Stability/normalization vs Free Patriotic Movement -3.0 · Resistance/maximalist
Δ 9.0 points
- West alignment
Kataeb Party +7.0 · Pro-Western vs Free Patriotic Movement -1.0 · Anti-Western
Δ 8.0 points
- Liberal democracy
Kataeb Party +5.0 · Strong commitment vs Free Patriotic Movement -2.5 · Weak/anti
Δ 7.5 points
Where they almost overlap
- Social
-1.5 vs -2.0
Δ 0.5 points
- Regime stance
+5.0 vs +5.5
Δ 0.5 points
- State & religion
+3.5 vs +2.0
Δ 1.5 points
Kataeb Party vs. Free Patriotic Movement
Maronite right against Aoun's Christian-Hezbollah pivot. Kataeb's civil-war Christian-right legacy against FPM's alliance with Hezbollah. The Christian Lebanese pair that doesn't include the Lebanese Forces.
Origins. The Kataeb (Phalanges) Party was founded in 1936 by Pierre Gemayel, modelling itself on European nationalist movements of the inter-war period (the trip to the 1936 Berlin Olympics is foundational lore). It was the dominant Christian-right party of the early-postwar Lebanese Republic and provided the militia core of the civil-war Lebanese Forces under Bachir Gemayel before the LF spun off as a separate organisation in the 1980s. The Free Patriotic Movement was founded in 2005 by Michel Aoun, the Maronite Army general who returned from Paris exile after Syria's withdrawal from Lebanon.
Where they diverge. The central cleavage of Maronite politics: the 2006 Mar Mikhael agreement in which the FPM signed a memorandum of understanding with Hezbollah, formally allying Aoun's Christian movement with the Iran-aligned Shia armed resistance. Kataeb has opposed Hezbollah's arms throughout the postwar period and was a principal voice in the 2005 Cedar Revolution that demanded Syrian withdrawal. On the Syrian regime: the FPM aligned with Assad's Syria after 2008; Kataeb was the principal vocal opponent of Syrian influence both during the Hafez al-Assad era and Bashar al-Assad era. On port explosion accountability: Kataeb chair Sami Gemayel was one of the loudest voices demanding accountability after the 2020 Beirut blast; the FPM's Bassil family was implicated by the investigation.
Where they overlap. Both are Christian-right parties operating within the Taif confessional power-sharing arrangement. Both formally accept the 1989 Taif agreement. Both compete for the same Maronite electoral base, alongside the Lebanese Forces (which split off from the Kataeb-Phalanges tradition in the 1980s).
Why it matters today. Kataeb has been a small parliamentary opposition voice through the 2010s and 2020s. The FPM was the leading Christian party while Aoun held the presidency 2016-2022; under Bassil's leadership since 2022 it has weakened. The Christian-right space is now structured around Kataeb + Lebanese Forces opposing FPM's residual Hezbollah-alignment legacy.
Primary documents
Most recent docs in the Tayyar corpus from each party. Click through for full text.
A Kataeb Party
B Free Patriotic Movement
Compass
A · Kataeb Party and B · Free Patriotic Movement are pinned with always-on labels. Other parties stay visible as faded context so you can locate either side on the map at a glance.
Spider overlay
A is the solid teal polygon; B is the dashed amber overlay. Distinct colors so the eye can always tell them apart, regardless of family.
Axis-by-axis
Sorted by absolute difference. Δ is A − B.
- Regional stance A+6.0B-3.0Δ +9.0
- West alignment A+7.0B-1.0Δ +8.0
- Liberal democracy A+5.0B-2.5Δ +7.5
- Civil liberties A+4.0B-2.5Δ +6.5
- Palestinian question A-1.5B+3.0Δ -4.5
- Pan-Arab vs particularist A-7.0B-3.8Δ -3.3
- Economic A+5.0B+2.0Δ +3.0
- Centralism vs federalism A+2.5B-0.5Δ +3.0
- Traditionalism vs modernization A+4.0B+2.0Δ +2.0
- Sectarian power-sharing A-4.0B-6.0Δ +2.0
- State & religion A+3.5B+2.0Δ +1.5
- Social A-1.5B-2.0Δ +0.5
- Regime stance A+5.0B+5.5Δ -0.5