compare
Compare two parties
Pick any two parties for a compared brief — top divergences and convergences auto-computed from the dataset, a comparative political-science brief for canonical pairs, plus the compass overlay, spider overlay, and axis-by-axis table.
Average axis distance
11.35
Lower = more similar (Euclidean across shared axes, normalized by count)
Cross-border · PS ↔ IL. Different families (islamist-sunni-electoral · nationalist-ethnic). Both currently in government. Founded 14 years apart. Mean axis distance Δ̄ 11.35.
Where they split hardest
- Palestinian question
Hamas +10.0 · Pro-Palestinian rights vs Likud -8.0 · Opposed
Δ 18.0 points
- Iran posture
Hamas +7.0 · Pro-Iran / aligned vs Likud -10.0 · Anti-Iran / adversarial
Δ 17.0 points
- West alignment
Hamas -8.5 · Anti-Western vs Likud +8.0 · Pro-Western
Δ 16.5 points
Where they almost overlap
- Centralism vs federalism
-5.0 vs -7.0
Δ 2.0 points
- Liberal democracy
-7.0 vs -4.0
Δ 3.0 points
- Press freedom
-8.0 vs -3.0
Δ 5.0 points
Hamas vs. Likud
The headline cleavage. Israel's Jewish-nationalist mainstream right against the Palestinian Islamist resistance movement. Two parties that don't recognise the other's right to exist on the same land.
Origins. Likud was founded in 1973 as a coalition around Menachem Begin's Herut — itself the heir of Jabotinsky's Revisionist Zionism. It won the 1977 Israeli election ending three decades of Labor dominance and has been the dominant Israeli right-wing party ever since. Hamas was founded in December 1987 during the First Intifada by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin and the Gaza branch of the Muslim Brotherhood; its 1988 charter framed Palestinian liberation as a religious-Islamic duty.
Where they diverge. Almost every axis. On the legitimacy of the other state: Likud's 1999 platform "flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state"; Hamas's 1988 charter and 2017 General Principles both reject the legitimacy of "the Zionist entity." On territory: both make maximalist claims to the same land between the river and the sea. On religion-and-state: Likud anchors a religious-nationalist Jewish coalition; Hamas is a Sunni Islamist movement applying religious framing to nationalism. On acceptable methods: Likud as the governing party uses state military force; Hamas as an armed group has used suicide attacks, rocket fire, and on 7 October 2023 a cross-border massacre — the precipitating event of the current Gaza war.
Where they overlap. A surprising amount of structural similarity. Both are nationalist projects that frame their conflict in existential and quasi-religious terms. Both reject the two-state solution as Western diplomats describe it. Both have ridden their respective conflicts to the right and toward more religious-conservative coalitions over the past two decades.
Why it matters today. This pair is the war. Netanyahu's Likud-led coalition has fought a war in Gaza against Hamas since 7 October 2023 in which approximately 60,000 Palestinians have been killed and a generation of children injured. Almost every other comparison in this corpus is downstream of this one.
In their own words
One verified quote from each side, sourced.
Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea.
Article 20 of the Hamas 2017 Document of General Principles and Policies — the maximalist territorial framing that sits alongside the 1967-borders "national consensus formula" in the same paragraph.
When citizens are killed in their homes and their land, all the rules change.
October 8, 2023 televised address — the morning after the Hamas attack on southern Israel. Frames the subsequent Israeli military campaign as a categorical shift, not a routine response.
Primary documents
Most recent docs in the Tayyar corpus from each party. Click through for full text.
A Hamas
- Gaza ceasefire and hostage-prisoner exchange deal takes effect (19 Jan 2025) 2025-01-19
- Hamas-led attack on southern Israel — 'Operation Al-Aqsa Flood' (7 October 2023) 2023-10-07
- Hamas — 2017 'Document of General Principles and Policies' (Zionism-not-Jews distinction, formula-of-national-consensus 1967-borders) 2017-05-01
B Likud
- Basic Law: Israel — the Nation State of the Jewish People (Knesset, 19 July 2018) 2018-07-19
- Israel's Anti-Boycott Law — “Law for Prevention of Damage to the State of Israel through Boycott, 5771-2011” 2011-07-11
- Likud Party electoral platform, 1999 (English translation of Hebrew original) 1999-01-01
Compass
A · Hamas and B · Likud are pinned with always-on labels. Other parties stay visible as faded context so you can locate either side on the map at a glance.
Spider overlay
A is the solid teal polygon; B is the dashed amber overlay. Distinct colors so the eye can always tell them apart, regardless of family.
Axis-by-axis
Sorted by absolute difference. Δ is A − B.
- Palestinian question A+10.0B-8.0Δ +18.0
- Iran posture A+7.0B-10.0Δ +17.0
- West alignment A-8.5B+8.0Δ -16.5
- Regime stance A-7.5B+9.0Δ -16.5
- Regional stance A-9.0B+6.0Δ -15.0
- Traditionalism vs modernization A-6.0B+4.0Δ -10.0
- Gender equality A-8.0B+2.0Δ -10.0
- Economic A-3.0B+6.0Δ -9.0
- Social A-8.0B-2.0Δ -6.0
- State & religion A-9.0B-3.0Δ -6.0
- Civil liberties A-8.0B-2.5Δ -5.5
- Press freedom A-8.0B-3.0Δ -5.0
- Liberal democracy A-7.0B-4.0Δ -3.0
- Centralism vs federalism A-5.0B-7.0Δ +2.0