compare
Compare two parties
Pick any two parties for a compared brief — top divergences and convergences auto-computed from the dataset, a comparative political-science brief for canonical pairs, plus the compass overlay, spider overlay, and axis-by-axis table.
Average axis distance
3.92
Lower = more similar (Euclidean across shared axes, normalized by count)
Cross-border · MA ↔ TN. Same family (islamist-sunni-electoral). Founded 17 years apart. Mean axis distance Δ̄ 3.92.
Where they split hardest
- Regime stance
Justice and Development Party +7.0 · pro-regime vs Ennahda -4.5 · anti-regime
Δ 11.5 points
- Press freedom
Justice and Development Party -2.0 · State-controlled press vs Ennahda +3.0 · Free press
Δ 5.0 points
- Civil liberties
Justice and Development Party -2.0 · Restrict vs Ennahda +2.5 · Expand
Δ 4.5 points
Where they almost overlap
- West alignment
+2.0 vs +2.0
Δ 0.0 points
- Palestinian question
+8.0 vs +8.0
Δ 0.0 points
- Pan-Arab vs particularist
+2.0 vs +2.0
Δ 0.0 points
Justice and Development Party vs. Ennahda
Maghreb Islamist electoralism. Tunisia's Ennahda against Morocco's PJD. Same Brotherhood-influenced tradition, very different state structures.
Origins. Ennahda was founded in 1981 by Rached Ghannouchi as the Movement of Islamic Tendency (MTI), banned and repressed under Bourguiba and Ben Ali, returning legally after the 2011 revolution to win the first post-revolution Constituent Assembly election. PJD (Justice and Development Party) was founded in 1998 as the political arm of Morocco's Movement of Unity and Reform (MUR), and won the 2011 election after the February 20 protests, governing Morocco for ten years through 2021.
Where they diverge. State structure: Tunisia is a republic where the Islamist party can compete for executive power; Morocco is a constitutional monarchy where the king retains ultimate authority and PJD coexisted with the makhzen. On religion-and-politics framing: Ennahda formally re-branded after 2016 as "Muslim Democrats" — abandoning Islamism as a political-program label while keeping Islam as a personal-values reference; PJD remains explicitly Islamist in self-description. On historical regime relations: Ennahda was imprisoned and exiled by the prior regime; PJD has always operated as a tolerated electoral participant within the monarchic system. On 2021 trajectory: Ennahda was crushed by Saied's post-July-25 power grab and its leadership including Ghannouchi imprisoned; PJD was electorally punished in 2021, replaced by Akhannouch's RNI but remains a legal parliamentary opposition.
Where they overlap. Both are Maghreb Brotherhood-tradition Islamist parties. Both accepted democratic-electoral participation as their primary mode. Both governed for periods of the 2011-2021 decade. Both have struggled with the political costs of governing in coalition with secular partners. Both maintain Sunni doctrinal continuity with Hassan al-Banna's movement, though both have substantially modernised their public face.
Why it matters today. This pair captures the trajectory of post-Arab-Spring Maghreb Islamism: electoral victories followed by either authoritarian rollback (Tunisia) or electoral defeat (Morocco). Whether the tradition continues to find space in the region is one of the central political questions of the 2020s.
In their own words
One verified quote from each side, sourced.
No verified quote on file yet for Justice and Development Party.
Democracy is not a Western invention; it is a universal human value.
Frequent framing across post-2011 public commentary defending an electoral-Islamist commitment to participating in Tunisian competitive politics rather than imposing a single-party project.
Primary documents
Most recent docs in the Tayyar corpus from each party. Click through for full text.
A Justice and Development Party
B Ennahda
- From Political Islam to Muslim Democracy — Rached Ghannouchi (Foreign Affairs, 2016) 2016-08-19
- Ennahda's March 2012 decision to retain Article 1 of the 1959 constitution unchanged (rejecting sharia as a source of legislation in the new constitution), with leader Rached Ghannouchi framing it as "a victory for the democratic Muslim state" — Al-Masry Al-Youm, reporting the decision announced Mon 26 Mar 2012 (article 29 Mar 2012). 2012-03-26
Compass
A · Justice and Development Party and B · Ennahda are pinned with always-on labels. Other parties stay visible as faded context so you can locate either side on the map at a glance.
Spider overlay
A is the solid teal polygon; B is the dashed amber overlay. Distinct colors so the eye can always tell them apart, regardless of family.
Axis-by-axis
Sorted by absolute difference. Δ is A − B.
- Regime stance A+7.0B-4.5Δ +11.5
- Press freedom A-2.0B+3.0Δ -5.0
- Civil liberties A-2.0B+2.5Δ -4.5
- Gender equality A-6.0B-2.0Δ -4.0
- Traditionalism vs modernization A-2.0B+1.0Δ -3.0
- Liberal democracy A+1.5B+4.0Δ -2.5
- State & religion A-6.0B-4.5Δ -1.5
- Economic A+3.0B+2.0Δ +1.0
- Social A-6.0B-5.0Δ -1.0
- Regional stance A-3.0B-4.0Δ +1.0
- Centralism vs federalism A-6.0B-7.0Δ +1.0
- West alignment A+2.0B+2.0Δ +0.0
- Palestinian question A+8.0B+8.0Δ +0.0
- Pan-Arab vs particularist A+2.0B+2.0Δ +0.0